2004
Meeting Theme
Contextual Pedagogies: Teaching Context as Religious Text
November 5-7, 2004
Brown Palace-Comfort Inn Complex
Denver, Colorado
A joint meeting of APRRE and the Religious Education Association (REA)
Religious
education has been understood as a profession standing at a fork in the
road facing “faithfulness to the ancient and honorable paths of the fathers”
on the one hand, and the knowledge required for contemporary religious
living on the other.
Faith communities and the world demand accountability for both an authentic
and usable knowledge
-- knowledge to help persons understand and respond to spiritual experiences.
Much of the debate at APRRE and REA over the past years has centered
on which road to take. Educators with a pastoral focus may downplay the
ancient text and those with an academic focus may believe that the present
context is not their major concern.
In
teaching, the text is typically understood as a book containing the gathered
wisdom of a scholar, or a community, that a teacher uses to help students
enlighten their experience. The
context, on the other hand, can refer to the setting or times in which
a particular text was produced.
Context can also mean the present
reality: the places from which students come -- the influences of
community surroundings, racial background, family structure; and places
to which they will go -- faith communities and neighborhoods in conflict,
atomized societies, pluralistic worlds. Here teachers help students both
gain and use the knowledge that no “text” may yet contain.
Perhaps,
the challenge of our theme can be captured in the wit and wisdom of Yogi
Berra: “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.” Relating text and context
calls us to teaching practices that, in David Tracy’s words, engage a
“mutual critical correlation between an interpretation” of the religious
experience and the contemporary situation.
This means reading the texts with a commitment to the poor and marginalized
in their contexts, teaching -- context as religious text.
The
issues of text and context, while not phrased in these words, have been
the focus for REA and APRRE in past discussions of “theory and practice.”
In Denver we can take a next
step with a critical study of religious educators’ teaching practices (contextual
pedagogy) connecting students’ learning to the contexts of life and
also connecting the realities of present life to a reinterpretation of
the texts. Our aim is a more dynamic description of teaching in religious
education promoting its enhancement
to benefit communities of faith and the broader public.
Questions and comments
about the theme and offers to assist in the design the meeting may be
directed to President-Elect, Bob O’Gorman
e-mail: rogorma@luc.edu
James Gustafson quoted in
Donald Schön. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think
in Action (New York: Basic Books, 1983), p.81.
Don S. Browning. Practical
Theology: The Emerging Field in Theology, Church, and World (San
Francisco: Harper and Row, 1983), p. 61.